COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

HIGHLANDS RANCH - ThunderRidge High School

9/28/2011 to 1/11/2013

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 39° 32.029’ or N 39° 32’ 1.74"
Longitude:
W 105° 0.644’ or W 105° 0’ 38.64"
Survey Meridian:
Colorado, Sixth Principal Meridian
Township:
6 S
Range:
68 W
Section:
9
Elevation:
5,725 feet (1,745 m)
Datum:
WGS 84
Tower Type:
A light pole
Tower Height:
10.5 m (34.58 feet)
Vane Offset (deg):
+30°
Direction Basis:
True North
Mag. Declination:
8° 52' E, changing by 7' W/yr
Wind Explorer S/N:
0749
Site No.:
3955

CSU ALP Install Team: Mike Kostrzewa (taking picture).

DATA DETAILS

September 28, 2011 to January 11, 2013:

An anemometer tower and wind vane were installed on September 28, 2011 on the campus of ThunderRidge High School. The sensors are mounted on a light pole near the entrance to the school's main parking lot, about 150 feet from the school building. The site has good access to NW/SE wind, but should be partially blocked by the school building from the north.

All data is collected using an NRG #40 Calibrated Anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane. The certification for the anemometer is as follows:

NRG #40C Calibrated Anemometer
Model No.
1900
Serial No.
1795-00090563
Calibration Date
12/1/08 5:23 p.m.
Slope
0.759 m/s per Hz
Offset
0.30 m/s

This equipment feeds into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs will be sent to the Colorado ALP at Colorado State University for analysis. This equipment feeds into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs are sent to the Colorado ALP at Colorado State University for analysis. The data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files
Highest
2 sec
Gust
m/s
Gust
Date/Time
Highlands_Ranch_3955_2011_0928_1125.A11 Highlands_Ranch_3955_2011_0928_1125.txt
20
10/6/2011 12:42
Highlands_Ranch_3955_2011_1125_0208.a11 Highlands_Ranch_3955_2011_1125_0208.txt
22
1/22/2012 7:34
Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0208_0605.a12 Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0208_0605.txt
22
2/22/2012 19:22
Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0605_0911.a12 Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0605_0911.txt
20
6/26/2012 17:34
Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0911_0111.A12 Highlands_Ranch_3955_2012_0911_0111.txt
24
10/16/2012 23:50

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset.

Using this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 2.4.6. For this data an offset of +30° was applied to the wind vane data. This data was flagged for icing in two ways:

  1. Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 0.5 m/s for 3 hours or more was flagged and not included in the wind resource analysis calculations
  2. Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 3 degrees for 6 hours or more was flagged and not included in the wind resource analysis calculations

A summary report, the combined data files (with and without the validation analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the validation analysis) are given below:

Interim Wind Resource Summary

Highlights of the wind resource to date at this site are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
9/28/2011 11:30 MST
Height above ground (m)
10.5
Data Set Ends:
1/11/2013 12:10
10-min. mean wind speed (m/s)
2.865
Data Set Duration:
15 months
10-min median wind speed (m/s)
2.740
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
10-min min. wind speed (m/s)
0.30
Elevation:
5,724 ft (1,745 m)
10-min max wind speed (m/s)
16.10
Mean air density (kg/m³):
1.032
10-min standard deviation (m/s)
1.530
Wind Power Coefficients
Weibull k
1.942
Power Density at 50m:
47 W/m²
Weibull c (m/s)
3.227
Wind Power Class:
1 (Poor)
Mean power density (W/m²)
25
Wind Shear Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
216
Power Law Exponent:
0.13
Mean turbulence intensity
0.304
Surface Roughness:
0.008 m
Energy pattern factor
2.028
Roughness Class:
0.74
Total data elements
203,484
Roughness Description:
Lawn Grass
Flagged wind speed data elements
418
Flagged direction data elements
1,588
Missing data elements
15
Data recovery rate (%)
100.0%
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 10.5m. A surface roughness of 0.008 meters was assumed for this projection. This is the surface roughness for an area with lawn grass. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.

 

 

Vertical Wind Shear, Height (m) vs Mean Wind Speed (m/s)

 

Wind Frequency Rose at 10.5 meters

 

Wind Energy Rose at 10.5 meters

 

Daily Wind Speed Profile at 10.5m, Hourly Mean Wind Speed (m/s) vs. Hour of the Day

 

Seasonal Wind Speed Profile at 10.5m, Monthly Mean Wind Speed (m/s) vs. Month

 

Probability Distribution Function at 10.5 m: Frequency (%) vs. Wind Speed (m/s)

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Keep in mind too that listing a particular turbine doesn't imply an endorsement - not does it imply that installing a particular turbine model is feasible or recommended for a particular site. For consistency, the larger turbines are included even at sites that where they may not be practical so that one can compare the relative production of different sites.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
m/s
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
10.2 2.85 63.2 0.0 0.2 1,600 2.5
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
10.2 2.85 32.9 0.0 0.3 2,200 2.5
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
10.2 2.85 11.3 0.1 0.0 300 3.8
Southwest AIR X
1.15
0.4
10.2 2.85 72.2 0.0 0.0 29 0.8
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
10.2 2.85 57.8 0.0 0.1 600 4.0
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
10.2 2.85 62.5 0.1 0.1 1,100 4.1
Northern Power NW 100/21
21
100
37 3.37 44.6 0.0 4.4 38,800 4.4
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
64.7 3.63 55.8 0.1 42.1 368,600 2.8
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
75 3.70 41.8 0.1 124.5 1,090,600 5.0
GE 3.0s
90
3,000
70 3.67 57.8 0.0 68.1 596,500 2.3
Vestas V90 - 1.8 MW
90
1,800
80 3.73 41.1 0.1 104.6 916,100 5.8
Vestas V90 - 2.0 MW
90
2,000
80 3.73 41.1 0.1 106.7 934,800 5.3
Vestas V90 - 3.0 MW 109.4 dB(A)
90
3,000
80 3.73 37.3 0.0 126.3 1,106,600 4.2
Vestas V100 - 1.8 MW
100
1,800
80 3.73 37.3 0.2 151.6 1,328,000 8.4
Vestas V100 - 2.0 MW
100
2,000
80 3.73 39.2 0.0 142.6 1,249,500 7.1
Vestas V100 - 2.6 MW
100
2,600
75 3.70 39.2 0.0 150.9 1,322,200 5.8
Vestas V112 - 3.0 MW
112
3,075
84 3.75 40.4 0.1 199.6 1,748,800 6.5

IMPORTANT: No turbine losses are included in the power, energy, and capacity factor values in the table. Typically, turbine losses can be 5-20% to account for maintenance downtime, icing/soiling and losses from other turbines in a wind farm. Users wanting to be conservative in the performance projections should multiply the power, energy, and capacity values by (1- % losses) to account for these losses.

 


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.