COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

GEORGETOWN - 7/24/2009 to 4/8/2010

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 39° 44.015’ or N 39° 44’1"
Longitude:
W 105° 41.358’ or W 105° 41’ 21"
Township:
4 S
Range:
74 W
Section:
4
Elevation (ft.):
8,430
Datum:
WGS 84
Tower Type:
NRG Tilt-Up
Tower Height:
20 m (65.6 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+147°
Direction Basis:
Magnetic North
Mag. Declination:
9° 30' E, changing by 8' W/yr
Wind Explorer S/N:
0925
Site No.:
0539

 CSU ALP Install Team (from left): Nate Davis, Todd MacDonald, Eric Rasbach, Derrick Benallie, Nick Wagner, Jake Renquist, and Mike Kostrzewa (taking picture).

 

DATA DETAILS

July 24, 2009 to April 8, 2010:

The anemometer tower was installed on July 24, 2009 and removed on April 8, 2010. The site is just below and on the north end of Georgetown Reservoir in Clear Creek County. It is easily seen from I-70. The site is in a valley so that winds are expected from the south down the valley.

All data was collected using an NRG #40 anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located at a height of 20m.

This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs were sent to the Colorado ALP at Colorado State University for analysis. The data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files

Highest
2 sec
Gust
mph

Gust
Date/Time
Georgetown_0539_2009_0724_0912.A09 Georgetown_0539_2009_0724_0912.txt
61
8/3/09 13:59
Georgetown_0539_2009_0912_1030.A09 Georgetown_0539_2009_0912_1030.txt
72
10/24/09 3:19
Georgetown_0539_2009_1030_0102.A09 Georgetown_0539_2009_1030_0102.txt
80
12/12/09 11:43
Georgetown_0539_2010_0102_0301.A10 Georgetown_0539_2010_0102_0301.txt
71
1/5/10 21:30
Georgetown_0539_2010_0301_0408.A10 Georgetown_0539_2010_0301_0408.txt
77
3/30/10 2:43

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

Using this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.45. For this data an offset of +147° was applied to the wind vane data. For this report, a validation analysis was performed on the data. This data was filtered two ways:

  1. Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 1 mph for 3 hours or more was deleted.
  2. Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 3 degrees over 6 hours was deleted

Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The combined data files (with and without the validation analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the validation analysis) are given below:

Final Wind Resource Summary

The anemometer tower was removed from the site on April 8, 2010. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire monitoring period are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
7/24/2009 10:50 MST
Height above ground (m)
20
Data Set Ends:
4/8/2010 08:50
Mean 10 min avg. wind speed (mph)
9.012
Data Set Duration:
8.5 months
Median 10 min avg. wind speed (mph)
8.050
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min 10 min avg. wind speed (mph)
0.525
Elevation (ft.):
8,430
Max 10 min avg. wind speed (mph)
51.040
Mean air density (kg/m³):
0.950
Mean power density (W/m²)
128
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
93
Power Density at 50m:
132 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
3.006
Wind Power Class:
1 (Poor)
Weibull k
1.313
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)
9.760
Power Law Exponent:
0.116
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.702
Surface Roughness:
0.005 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.230
Roughness Class:
0.64
Hour of peak wind speed
14
Roughness Description:
Lawn grass
Mean turbulence intensity
0.3378
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 20m. A surface roughness of 0.005 meters was assumed for this projection. This is the surface roughness for surface bewteen a smooth lawn and a snow surface. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
6.6603
Frequency of calms (%)
0
Total data elements
111,420
Suspect/missing elements
1,339
Data completeness (%)
98.8

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
20
9.01 46.2 1.25 0.9 7,900 12.0
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
20
9.01 32.78 0.55 1 8,500 9.7
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
20
9.01 20.23 1.72 0.1 1,200 13.8
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
20
9.01 42.75 0 0.3 2,200 14.2
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
20
9.01 46.19 1.48 0.5 4,000 15.4
Northern Power NW 100/21
21
100
37
9.68 40.37 0 11.8 103,000 11.8
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
10.33 40.68 0.13 85.0 744,600 12.9
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
10.59 45.90 1.38 164.7 1,442,300 11.0
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
10.86 44.71 0.62 285.2 2,498,600 14.3
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
10.98 38.92 1.72 404.7 3,545,100 16.2

IMPORTANT: No turbine losses are included in the power, energy, and capacity factor values in the table. Typically, turbine losses can be 5-20% to account for maintenance downtime, icing/soiling and losses from other turbines in a wind farm. Users wanting to be conservative in the performance projections should multiply the power, energy, and capacity values by (1- % losses) to account for these losses.


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.