COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

Sheep Mountain (Usry Ranch)

9/9/2008 through 5/21/2010

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 37° 39.038' or N 37° 39' 2"
Longitude:
W 105° 10.380' or W 105° 10' 23 "
Map Datum :
NAD 83
Basis:
Colorado, Sixth Principal Meridian
Township:
27 S
Range:
70 W
Section:
36
Elevation:
2,554 m (8,379 feet)
Tower Type:
NRG Tilt-Up
Tower Height:
50 m (165 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
0
Direction Basis:
True North
Mag. Declination:
9° 8' E, changing by 7' W/yr
Site Number:
5440
Symphonie S/N:
0759

DATA DETAILS

September 9, 2008 through May 21, 2010:

This tower is the sole 50m anemometer tower owned by the Governor's Energy Office. It is intended for community wind projects. The anemometer tower was installed on September 9, 2008 and removed on May 21, 2010.

Data was collected using four (4) NRG #40 Anemometers and two (2) NRG #200P Wind Vanes, as follows:

  • Anemometers
    1. 30 meters heading 225° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom
    2. 40 meters heading 225° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom
    3. 49.53 meters heading 225° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom
    4. 49.53 meters heading 135° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom
  • Wind Vanes
    1. 38 meters heading 0° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom with the null point facing away from the tower
    2. 48.53 meters heading 0° on an NRG 43" offset standard boom with the null point facing away from the tower

There was also a temperature sensor at a height of 2.5 meters on a 6" boom, a voltmeter in the data logger box, and relative humidity at a height of 2 meters under the data logger box.

All sensors fed into an NRG Symphonie data logger. The certifications for the anemometers are as follows:

NRG #40C Calibrated Anemometers
Anem. No.
1
2
3
4
Height
30 m
40 m
49.53 m
49.53 m
Model No.
1900
1900
1900
1900
Serial No.
1795000 71317
1795000 78800
1795000 71318
1795000 71319
Calibration Date
7/3/08 6:23 PM
8/22/08 12:49 PM
7/3/08 6:33 PM
7/3/08 6:43 PM
Slope
0.759 m/s per Hz
0.757 m/s per Hz
0.758 m/s per Hz
0.761 m/s per Hz
Offset
0.33 m/s
0.40 m/s
0.34 m/s
0.34 m/s

The data logger generated wind reports for each day. Using the Symphonie Data Retriever software, each day's data was complied into one large data file. A zipped file that contains all of the NRG data files and a text version of the aggregate data for all days are given below .

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files
Sheep_Mountain_Usry_Ranch_5440_2008_0910_2010_0521_RWD.zip

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset.

From this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed for entire data collection period using Windographer 1.45. No offset was applied to the wind vane data as none was needed. Since the data set contains data for two or more wind speed sensors at different heights above the ground, Windographer considered the wind shear relationship between different wind speed sensors to synthesize missing data for those wind speed sensors. A best fit using the power law profile was chosen to synthesize the data. Once the wind shear relation was chosen, a daily influence on the wind shear profile was considered so that in each time step where the wind speed is known at one height but not at a different height, Windographer estimated the unknown wind speed based on the best-fit wind shear profile for the appropriate hour of the day.

Using this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.45. For this report, a data quality analysis was performed on the data. This data was filtered two ways:

  1. Any wind speed data (from any anemometer) where the wind speed was less than 1 m/s at a temperature less than 2°C for 4 hours or more was deleted.
  2. Any wind direction data (from any wind vane) where the wind direction varied by less than 2 degrees at a temperature less than 2°C for 4 hours or more was deleted.

Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The summary report, the combined data files (with and without the data quality analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the data quality analysis) are given below:

Final Wind Resource Summary

The anemometer tower was removed from the site on May 21, 2010. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire monitoring period are shown below:

Data Properties
Data Set Starts:
9/10/2008 00:00 MDT
Data Set Ends:
5/21/2010 8:00
Data Set Duration:
20 months
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Elevation:
2,554 m
Mean air density (kg/m³):
0.931
Wind Power Coefficients
Power Density at 50m:
510 W/m²
Wind Power Class:
5 (Excellent)
Calculated Wind Shear Coefficients
Power Law Exponent:
0.0711
Surface Roughness:
0.0000306 m
Roughness Class:
0.00
Roughness Description:
Smooth

 

Variable
Speed 50m - A
Speed 50m - B
Speed 40 m
Speed 30 m
Height above ground (ft)
165 ft (50m)
165 ft (50m)
132 ft (40m)
98 ft (30m)
Mean wind speed (m/s)
8.210 8.414 8.143 8.013
Median wind speed (m/s)
7.95 8.20 7.95 7.75
Standard Deviation (m/s)
4.729
4.827
4.640
4.472
Min wind speed (m/s)
0.223 0.223 0.218 0.213
Max wind speed (m/s)
26.93 27.37 26.22 25.88
Mean power density (W/m²)
533 570 512 479
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
4,669 4,991 4,488 4,197
Energy pattern factor
2.059 2.045 2.030 1.992
Weibull k
1.714 1.714 1.730 1.777
Weibull c (m/s)
9.151 9.373 9.077 8.944
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.882 0.881 0.878 0.879
Diurnal pattern strength
0.110 0.110 0.110 0.109
Hour of peak wind speed
8
8
8
9
Mean turbulence intensity
0.1895
0.1907
0.1933
0.1903
Possible records
89,040 89,040 89,040 89,040
Valid records
87,622
87,789
87,072
87,490
Missing records
1,418
1,251
1,968
1,550
Data Recovery Rate (%)
98.41
98.60
97.79
98.26
Total data elements
3,205,440
Suspect/missing elements
10,363
Data completeness (%)
99.7

 

Wind Shear

 

Probability Distribution Function for the 50m Anemometer - A

 

Probability Distribution Function for the 50m Anemometer - B

 

Wind Rose at 38m

 

Wind Rose at 48m

 

Daily Wind Speed Profile

 

Seasonal Wind Speed Profile

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
m/s
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
30 8.01 16.52 14.62 3.20 28,300 43.1
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
30 8.01 10.03 9.50 3.70 32,800 37.4
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
30 8.01 5.07 21.32 0.50 4,300 49.2
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
30 8.01 14.46 0 0.70 6,500 41.2
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
30 8.01 16.39 18.11 1.50 12,900 49.2
Northern Power NW 100/21
21
100
37 8.12 15.21 0 33.90 297,100 33.9
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65 8.48 16.57 2.26 267.60 2,344,200 40.5
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5 8.62 20.24 14.56 584.10 5,116,500 38.9
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100 8.77 20.15 7.91 847.10 7,420,800 42.4
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
100 8.77 16.71 15.86 1,133.90 9,933,100 45.4
Vestas V90 - 3.0 MW
90
3,000
105 8.80 15.27 2.83 1,139.40 9,981,300 38.0

IMPORTANT: No turbine losses are included in the power, energy, and capacity factor values in the table. Typically, turbine losses can be 5-20% to account for maintenance downtime, icing/soiling and losses from other turbines in a wind farm. Users wanting to be conservative in the performance projections should multiply the power, energy, and capacity values by (1- % losses) to account for these losses.


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.