WELLINGTON - 6/12/2008 through 6/18/2009
LOCATION DETAILS |
Latitude: |
N 40° 44.624’ or N 40° 44’ 37" |
Longitude: |
W 104° 58.137’ or W 104° 58’ 8" |
Township: |
9 N |
Range: |
68 W |
Section: |
14 |
Elevation (ft.): |
5,323 |
Tower Type: |
NRG Tilt-Up |
Tower Height: |
20 m (65.6 ft) |
Vane Offset (deg): |
+342° |
Direction Basis: |
Magnetic North |
Mag. Declination: |
9° 22' E, changing by 8' W/yr |
Wind Explorer S/N: |
0749 |
Site No.: |
4004 |
DATA DETAILS
June 12, 2008 through June 18, 2009:
The anemometer tower was installed on June 12, 2008. The site was located about 3 miles northeast of Wellington in a pasture, with higher ground to the east. The wind was thought to funnel through a gap in the mountains about 10 miles east. The lessee's house is locaed just west of where the tower site was..
All data was collected using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located on the landowner's property at a height of 20m. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs were sent to the Colorado ALP at Colorado State University for analysis. The data plug files and text versions for all files received during the measuring period are given below.
It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.
Using this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.45. For this data an offset of +342° was applied to the wind vane data. For this report, a validation analysis was performed on the data. This data was filtered two ways:
- Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 1 mph for 2 hours or more was deleted.
- Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 3 degrees over 6 hours was deleted
Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The combined data files (with and without the validation analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the validation analysis) are given below:
Final Wind Resource Summary
The anemometer tower was removed from the site on June 18, 2009. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire monitoring period are shown below:
Data Properties |
Variable |
Data Set Starts: |
6/12/2008 12:00 MST |
Height above ground (m) |
20 |
Data Set Ends: |
06/18/2009 7:40 |
Mean 10 min avg. wind speed (mph) |
10.875 |
Data Set Duration: |
12 months |
Median 10 min avg. wind speed (mph) |
9.00 |
Length of Time Step: |
10 minutes |
Min 10 min avg. wind speed (mph) |
0.732 |
Elevation (ft.): |
5,323 |
Max 10 min avg. wind speed (mph) |
49.8 |
Mean air density (kg/m³): |
1.046 |
Mean power density (W/m²) |
174 |
Wind Power Coefficients |
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr) |
1,528 |
Power Density at 50m: |
249 W/m² |
Energy pattern factor |
2.904 |
Wind Power Class: |
2 (Marginal) |
Weibull k |
1.511 |
Wind Shear Coefficients |
Weibull c (mph) |
12.087 |
Power Law Exponent: |
0.126 |
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient |
0.808 |
Surface Roughness: |
0.01 m |
Diurnal pattern strength |
0.178 |
Roughness Class: |
0.780 |
Hour of peak wind speed |
16 |
Roughness Description: |
Rough Pasture |
Mean turbulence intensity |
0.2093 |
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 20m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above. |
Standard deviation (mph) |
7.547 |
Frequency of calms (%) |
0.0% |
Total data elements |
213,592 |
Suspect/missing elements |
39,692 |
Data completeness (%) |
81.4 |
Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.
Turbine |
Rotor
Diameter
meters |
Rotor
Power
kW |
Hub
Height
meters |
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph |
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent |
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent |
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW |
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr |
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
% |
Bergey Excel-R |
6.7 |
7.5 |
20 |
10.87 |
35.39 |
4.14 |
1.1 |
9,400 |
14.3 |
Bergey Excel-S |
6.7 |
10 |
20 |
10.87 |
18.97 |
2.64 |
1.2 |
10,800 |
12.3 |
Bergey XL.1 |
2.5 |
1 |
20 |
10.87 |
6.94 |
6.09 |
0.2 |
1,500 |
16.7 |
Southwest Skystream 3.7 |
3.7 |
1.8 |
20 |
10.87 |
33.00 |
0.00 |
0.3 |
2,600 |
16.3 |
Southwest Whisper 500 |
4.5 |
3 |
20 |
10.87 |
35.38 |
5.11 |
0.5 |
4,600 |
17.6 |
Northern Power NW 100/20 |
20 |
100 |
25 |
11.22 |
31.42 |
0.00 |
12.8 |
112,400 |
12.8 |
Vestas V47 - 660 kW |
47 |
660 |
65 |
12.83 |
27.11 |
1.40 |
105.8 |
927,200 |
16.0 |
GE 1.5s |
70.5 |
1,500 |
81 |
13.22 |
33.82 |
6.09 |
221.9 |
1,943,800 |
14.8 |
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW |
80 |
2,000 |
100 |
13.62 |
31.43 |
3.96 |
355.1 |
3,110,600 |
17.8 |
GE 2.5xl |
100 |
2,500 |
110 |
13.81 |
24.42 |
7.04 |
490.0 |
4,292,500 |
19.6 |
|