SCHRIEVER AFB
10/18/2007 through 10/21/2008
LOCATION DETAILS |
Latitude: |
N 38° 48′ 13.86" |
Longitude: |
W 104° 30′ 51.63" |
Township: |
14 S |
Range: |
64 W |
Section: |
25 |
Elevation (ft.): |
6,256.8 |
Tower Type: |
NRG Tilt-Up |
Tower Height: |
30 m (98.4 ft) |
Vane Offset (deg): |
+8 |
Direction Basis: |
Mag. North |
Mag. Declination: |
9° 2' E, changing by 7' W/yr |
Site Number: |
1817 |
Wind Explorer S/N: |
0663 |
DATA DETAILS
October 18, 2007 through October 21, 2008:
The anemometer tower was installed on October 18, 2007 in an open pasture within the the grounds Schriever AFB. All data was collected using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located on the landowner's property at a height of 30m. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs were sent to the Colorado ALP at Colorado State University for analysis. The data plug files and text versions for all files received during the measuring period are given below.
It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.
Using this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.21. For this data an offset of +8° was applied to the wind vane data. For this report, a data validation analysis was performed on the data. This data was filtered two ways:
- Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 1 mph for 3 hours or more was deleted.
- Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 3 degrees over 5 hours was deleted
Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The combined data files (with and without the data validation analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the data validation analysis) are given below:
Note that the txt files with data validation also include the projected output in kW in 10, 15, and 60 minute intervals from a Fuhrlander FL 1500 70m on a 70m tower wind turbine using the wind data from this site.
Final Wind Resource Summary
The anemometer tower was removed from the site on October 21, 2008. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire monitoring period are shown below:
Data Properties |
Variable |
Data Set Starts: |
10/18/2007 16:50 MDT |
Height above ground (m) |
30 |
Data Set Ends: |
10/21/2008 11:10 |
Mean wind speed (mph) |
12.30 |
Data Set Duration: |
12 months |
Median wind speed (mph) |
10.80 |
Length of Time Step: |
10 minutes |
Min wind speed (mph) |
0.51 |
Elevation (ft.): |
6,257 |
Max wind speed (mph) |
55.3 |
Calm threshold (mph): |
0 |
Mean power density (W/m²) |
205 |
Wind Power Coefficients |
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr) |
1,795 |
Power Density at 50m: |
247 W/m² |
Energy pattern factor |
2.427 |
Wind Power Class: |
2 (Marginal) |
Weibull k |
1.631 |
Wind Shear Coefficients |
Weibull c (mph) |
13.73 |
Power Law Exponent: |
0.121 |
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient |
0.823 |
Surface Roughness: |
0.01 m |
Diurnal pattern strength |
0.147 |
Roughness Class: |
0.78 |
Hour of peak wind speed |
18 |
Roughness Description: |
Rough pasture |
Mean turbulence intensity |
0.176 |
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 30m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
|
Standard deviation (mph) |
7.72 |
Coefficient of variation (%) |
62.8 |
Frequency of calms (%) |
0 |
Possible records |
53,102 |
Valid records |
52,404 |
Missing observations |
698 |
Data completeness (%) |
98.7 |
Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.
Turbine |
Rotor
Diameter
meters |
Rotor
Power
kW |
Hub
Height
meters |
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph |
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent |
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent |
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW |
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr |
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
% |
Bergey Excel-R |
6.7 |
7.5 |
30 |
12.30 |
27.90 |
4.50 |
1.44 |
12,600 |
19.2 |
Bergey Excel-S |
6.7 |
10 |
30 |
12.30 |
14.70 |
2.61 |
1.60 |
14,000 |
16.0 |
Bergey XL.1 |
2.5 |
1 |
30 |
12.30 |
6.60 |
6.38 |
0.22 |
1,900 |
22.0 |
Southwest Skystream 3.7 |
3.7 |
1.8 |
30 |
12.30 |
25.25 |
0 |
0.39 |
3,400 |
21.5 |
Southwest Whisper 500 |
4.5 |
3 |
30 |
12.30 |
27.84 |
5.48 |
0.70 |
6,100 |
23.3 |
Northern Power NW 100/20 |
20 |
100 |
30 |
12.30 |
38.69 |
0 |
12.9 |
112,600 |
12.9 |
Vestas V47 - 660 kW |
47 |
660 |
65 |
13.70 |
23.13 |
0.84 |
127 |
1,115,500 |
19.3 |
Fuhrlander FL 1500 70m |
70 |
1,500 |
70 |
13.85 |
23.12 |
6.58 |
309 |
2,710,300 |
20.6 |
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW |
80 |
2,000 |
100 |
14.56 |
27.25 |
2.79 |
429 |
3,757,600 |
21.4 |
GE 2.5xl |
100 |
2,500 |
110 |
14.75 |
20.78 |
6.12 |
599 |
5,248,300 |
24.0 |
|