COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

VICTOR/DEADWOOD - 08/15/2007 through 02/27/2008

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 38° 44.690'
Longitude:
W 105° 09.368'
Township:
15 S
Range:
69 W
Section:
18
Elevation (ft.):
10,325
Tower Type:
Weather station
Tower Height:
22.9 m (75 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+278
Direction Basis:
Mag. North
Mag. Declination:
9° 14' E, changing by 7' W/yr
Site Number:
0001
Wind Explorer S/N:
1479

DATA DETAILS

August 15, 2007 through February 27, 2008:

The anemometer tower was installed on August 15, 2007 on the property of the AngloGold Ashanti (Colorado) Corp.'s Cripple Creek & Victor gold mine. The tower is located at a height of about 75 feet on a weather station on a 2:1 slope overlooking the town of Cripple Creek. All data was collected by Anglogold Ashanti personnel using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200P Wind Vane. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. The data plug files were received by CSU for analysis. The data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

From this data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed for the period from August 15, 2007 through February 27, 2008 using Windographer 1.13. For this data, an offset of +278 degrees was applied to the wind vane data. No data quality analysis was conducted for this data. The combined data file and the Windographer files are given below:

Current Wind Resource Summary

Highlights of the wind resource at this site through the most recent data ending on February 27, 2008 are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
8/15/2007 9:50
Height above ground (m)
22.9
Data Set Ends:
2/27/2008 8:50
Mean wind speed (mph)
13.19
Data Set Duration:
5.5 months
Median wind speed (mph)
12.50
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min wind speed (mph)
0.80
Elevation (ft.):
10,325
Max wind speed (mph)
41.6
Calm threshold (mph):
0
Mean power density (W/m²)
173
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
1,516
Power Density at 50m:
244 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
1.886
Wind Power Class:
2 (Marginal)
Weibull k
1.985
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)

14.84

Power Law Exponent:
0.14
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.818
Surface Roughness:
0.01 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.074
Roughness Class:
0.780
Hour of peak wind speed
14
Roughness Description:
Rough Pasture
Mean turbulence intensity
0.208
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 22.9 m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
6.85
Coefficient of variation (%)
51.9
Frequency of calms (%)
0
Actual observations
28,212
Missing observations
6
Data completeness (%)
100

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
20
13.01
21.4
3.1
1.43
12,510
19.0
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
20
13.01
10.7
1.1
1.51
13,252
15.1
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
20
13.01
4.5
4.0
0.21
1,872
21.4
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
20
13.01
18.1
0
0.38
3,321
21.1
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
20
13.01
21.4
3.5
0.70
6,155
23.4
Northern Power NW 100/20
20
100
25
13.43
28.4
0
13.0
113,506
13.0
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
15.35
15.9
0.2
142
1,247,577
21.6
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
15.81
20.1
3.9
291
2,549,898
19.4
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
16.3
19.2
1.6
482
4,222,634
24.1
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
16.52
14.1
5.0
680
5,961,171
27.2

 

 


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.