COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

VICTOR/GUYOT - 9/14/2007 through 9/8/2008

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 38° 43.497'
Longitude:
W 105° 09.834'
Township:
15 S
Range:
69 W
Section:
30
Elevation (ft.):
9,883
Tower Type:
Weather station
Tower Height:
13 m (42.7 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+36
Direction Basis:
Mag. North
Mag. Declination:
9° 14' E, changing by 7' W/yr
Site Number:
0002
Wind Explorer S/N:
1430

DATA DETAILS

September 14, 2007 through September 8, 2008:

The anemometer tower was installed on September 14, 2007 on the property of the AngloGold Ashanti (Colorado) Corp.'s Cripple Creek & Victor gold mine. The tower is located at a height of about 45 feet at the top of a weather station on a hill overlooking the town of Cripple Creek. All data was collected by Anglogold Ashanti personnel using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200P Wind Vane. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. The data plug files were received by CSU for analysis. The data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files
Guyot_2007_1231_0227.a07 Guyot_2007_1231_0227.txt

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

From this data, an analysis of the wind resource was developed using Windographer 1.21 for the period from September 14, 2007 through September 8, 2008. For this data, an offset of +36 degrees was applied to the wind vane data. A data validation was also performed on the data. This data was filtered two ways:

  1. Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 1 mph for 3 hours or more was deleted.
  2. Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 5 degrees over 6 hours was deleted

Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The Windographer files (with and without data validation) and the combined data files (with and without data validation) are given below:

Current Wind Resource Summary

Highlights of the wind resource at this site through the most recent data ending on September 8, 2008 are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
9/14/2007 12:40
Height above ground (m)
13
Data Set Ends:
9/8/2008 05:00
Mean wind speed (mph)
12.54
Data Set Duration:
12 months
Median wind speed (mph)
11.70
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min wind speed (mph)
0.80
Elevation (ft.):
9,883
Max wind speed (mph)
56.30
Calm threshold (mph):
0
Mean power density (W/m²)
167
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
1,466
Power Density at 50m:
284 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
2.092
Wind Power Class:
2 (Marginal)
Weibull k
1.822
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)
14.09
Power Law Exponent:
0.131
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.790
Surface Roughness:
0.01 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.158
Roughness Class:
0.78
Hour of peak wind speed
9
Roughness Description:
Rough pasture
Mean turbulence intensity
0.217
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 13m. This is quite far to project and the results should be viewed skeptically. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
7.06
Coefficient of variation (%)
56.3
Frequency of calms (%)
0
Possible records
51,938
Valid records
51,929
Missing records
9
Data recovery rate (%)
100

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
20
13.32
22.12
4.24
1.54
13,500
20.5
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
20
13.32
12.35
2.20
1.67
14,600
16.7
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
20
13.32
5.55
5.74
0.23
2,000
23.2
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
20
13.32
19.30
0
0.40
3,500
22.2
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
20
13.32
22.06
5.06
0.75
6,600
25.0
Northern Power NW 100/20
20
100
25
13.74
28.20
0
14.1
123,900
14.1
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
15.71
17.03
0.71
152
1,334,900
23.1
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
16.19
21.09
5.67
317
2,779,000
21.1
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
16.69
20.05
3.08
512
4,482,000
25.6
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
16.91
15.92
6.98
716
6,269,100
28.6

 

 


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.