COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

DELTA - 06/27/2006 through 11/11/2007

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 38° 48.727'
Longitude:
W 108° 10.687'
Township:
14 S
Range:
97 W
Section:
25
Elevation (ft.):
5,873
Tower Type:
NRG Tilt-Up
Tower Height:
30 m (98.4 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+202°
Direction Basis:
Unknown
Mag. Declination:
10° 45' E
Site Number:
1175
Wind Explorer S/N:
1175

DATA DETAILS

June 27, 2006 through November 11, 2007:

The anemometer tower was installed on June 27, 2006 by utility personnel from Tri-State Generation & Transmission and Delta-Montrose Electric Association. The site was located on top of a mesa northwest of Delta. All data was collected using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located on the landowner's property at a height of 30m. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. Six data plugs were sent into the Governor's Energy Office and then to the University of North Dakota for analysis. However, none of the data plugs were processed by UND. The final data plug was collected when the tower was removed on November 11, 2007. The data plug files and text versions of the all data plug files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

CSU was chosen as the contractor for the program on September 14, 2007. From all data collected during the monitoring period, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.13. For this data, an offset of +202 degrees was applied to the wind vane data. The summary report, the combined data file (without any data quality analysis), and the Windographer files are given below:

Wind Resource Summary

Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the preiod from June 27, 2006 through November 11, 2007 are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
6/27/2006 11:10
Height above ground (m)
30
Data Set Ends:
11/11/2007 17:40
Mean wind speed (mph)
10.56
Data Set Duration:
18 months
Median wind speed (mph)
9.50
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min wind speed (mph)
0.55
Elevation (ft.):
5,873
Max wind speed (mph)
58.6
Calm threshold (mph):
0
Mean power density (W/m²)
135
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
1,182
Power Density at 50m:
167 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
2,493
Wind Power Class:
1 (Poor)
Weibull k
1.657
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)

11.83

Power Law Exponent:
0.14
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.687
Surface Roughness:
0.01 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.156
Roughness Class:
0.780
Hour of peak wind speed
17
Roughness Description:
Rough Pasture
Mean turbulence intensity
0.210
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 30m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
6.62
Coefficient of variation (%)
62.7
Frequency of calms (%)
0
Actual observations
72,327
Missing observations
0
Data completeness (%)
100

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
30
10.56
33.5
2.17
0.98
8,620
13.1
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
30
10.56
18.0
1.26
1.09
9,586
10.9
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
30
10.56
7.3
3.15
0.15
1,336
15.2
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
30
10.56
30.5
0
0.28
2,488
15.8
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
30
10.56
33.4
2.64
0.50
4,417
16.8
Northern Power NW 100/20
20
100
30
10.56
45.9
0
8.01
70,158
8.0
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
11.77
28.0
0.51
87.4
765,354
13.2
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
12.13
34.1
2.50
173
1,517,707
11.6
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
12.50
25.9
2.90
350
3,062,500
17.5
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
12.67
25.3
3.07
424
3,716,859
17.0

For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.