COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

SEIBERT - 8/29/2006 through 5/30/2008

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 39° 07.754' or N 39 ° 07’ 45 "
Longitude:
W 102° 54.738' or W 102° 54’ 44"
Township:
10 S
Range:
49 W
Section:
32
Elevation (ft.):
4,841
Tower Type:
NRG Tilt-Up
Tower Height:
20 m (65.6 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+24° by UND; +38° by CSU
Direction Basis:
Mag. North
Mag. Declination:
8° 21' E, changing by 8' W/yr
Site Number:
0749
Wind Explorer S/N:
0749

DATA DETAILS

August 29, 2006 through July 2, 2007:

The anemometer tower was installed on August 29, 2006. The site is located 12 miles south-southwest of the town of Seibert and 2 miles west of State Highway 59. The tower is located in a rural area predominately used for agriculture. The region’s land form consists of gently rolling terrain associated with the plains east of the Rocky Mountains. The site should have good exposure to the wind due to its rural location and relatively flat terrain.

All data was collected using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200P Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located on the landowner's property at a height of 20m. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. Five data plugs were sent into the Governor's Energy Office and then to the University of North Dakota for analysis. The data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files
Seibert_0749_2007_0301_0403.A07 Seibert_0749_2007_0301_0403.txt

It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

For this data, UND applied an offset of +24° to the wind vane data. This corrected data and wind resource summary report for the period from August 29, 2006 through March 1, 2007 are available here:

July 2, 2007 through May 30, 2008:

CSU was chosen as the contractor for the program on September 14, 2007. Data collected since September 14, 2007 is given below:

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data Plug Files
Txt Files
Seibert_0749_2007_1010_1222.txt
Seibert_0749_2008_0326_0530.A08 Seibert_0749_2008_0326_0530.txt

Again, it is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset or temperature.

From both the UND and CSU data, an analysis of the wind resource report was developed using Windographer 1.13. For this data, an offset of +24° was applied to the wind vane data. For this report, a data quality analysis similar to the UND analysis was performed for the data from for the period from August 29, 2006 through December 22, 2007. This data was filtered two ways:

  1. Any wind speed data where the wind speed was less than 1 mph for 3 hours or more was deleted.
  2. Any wind direction data where the wind direction varied by less than 3 degrees over six hours was deleted

Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The summary report, the combined data files (with and without the data quality analysis), and the Windographer files (with and without the data quality analysis) are given below:

Based on measurments taken at the site on May 30, 2008, it was determined that the actual offset should be +38°. Another analysis was prefromed as described and included all data during the measurement period from August 29, 2006 through May 30, 2008. A data quality analysis was performed as described above. The final wind resource summary files from this analysis are given below:

Complete Wind Resource Summary

The anemometer tower was removed from the site on May 30, 2008. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire data collection period using the Windographer for the data adjusted for data quality and offset by +38° are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
8/29/2006 13:00
Height above ground (m)
20
Data Set Ends:
5/30/2008 12:00
Mean wind speed (mph)
14.17
Data Set Duration:
21 months
Median wind speed (mph)
13.30
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min wind speed (mph)
0.49
Elevation (ft.):
4,841
Max wind speed (mph)
57.0
Calm threshold (mph):
0
Mean power density (W/m²)
245
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
2,149
Power Density at 50m:
347 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
1.820
Wind Power Class:
3 (Fair)
Weibull k
2.130
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)
15.97
Power Law Exponent:
0.14
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.847
Surface Roughness:
0.01 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.067
Roughness Class:
0.780
Hour of peak wind speed
13
Roughness Description:
Rough Pasture
Mean turbulence intensity
0.131
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 20m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
6.92
Coefficient of variation (%)
48.9
Frequency of calms (%)
0
Actual observations
92,154
Missing observations
9
Data completeness (%)
100

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
20
14.17
12.92
5.12
1.82
16,000
24.3
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
20
14.17
5.99
2.81
1.98
17,400
19.8
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
20
14.17
2.39
7.21
0.27
2,400
27.4
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
20
14.17
11.61
0
0.50
4,400
27.9
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
20
14.17
12.86
6.28
0.89
7,800
29.5
Northern Power NW 100/20
20
100
25
14.57
20.78
0
17.4
152,800
17.4
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
16.43
9.00
1.14
175
1,535,800
26.6
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
16.88
12.46
6.70
359
3,149,100
24.0
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
17.35
11.65
3.74
580
5,082,300
29.0
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
17.56
8.21
7.78
811
7,103,000
32.4

 

 


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.