COLORADO ANEMOMETER LOAN PROGRAM
 

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Wind Resource Maps
ALP Sites and Data
Small Wind Electric Systems: A Colorado Consumer's Guide
Small Wind Applications Guide Video
Professional Anemometry
Donations

APPLICATION INFORMATION

Program Goals
Selection Criteria
Lessee Responsibilities
Site Layout and Anchors
Tower Safety
Data Plug Replacement
Ideal Sites
Online Application
 

WIND TURBINE RESOURCES

Zoning
Equipment Information and Dealers
Financing
Links

ABOUT US

Current Personnel
Student Positions
Contact Us

JULESBURG - 4/21/2003 through 7/9/2004

LOCATION DETAILS
Latitude:
N 40° 55.183’ or N 40° 55’ 11"
Longitude:
W 102° 15.3833’ or W 102° 15’ 23"
Township:
11 N
Range:
44 W
Section:
21
Elevation (ft.):
3,790
Tower Type:
NRG Tilt-Up
Tower Height:
20m (65.6 ft)
Vane Offset (deg):
+9°
Direction Basis:
Unknown
Site Number:
0665
Wind Explorer S/N:
0665

DATA DETAILS

April 21, 2003 through July 9, 2004:

The anemometer tower was installed on April 9, 2003. The site was located 4.8 miles southeast of the town of Julesburg and 2.2 miles southeast of I-76. The tower was located in a pasture that is situated on a plateau above the South Platte River. The vegetation around the area was predominately grass. A rural residence with a shelter belt of trees is located a quarter of a mile to the east. Overall, the site has good exposure to the wind.

All data was collected using an NRG #40 Anemometer and NRG #200 Wind Vane mounted on a tilt-up tower located on the landowner's property at a height of 20m. This equipment fed into an NRG Wind Explorer data logger. All data plugs were sent into the Governor's Energy Office and then to the University of North Dakota for analysis. All data plug files and text versions of these files are given below.

Raw Wind Data Files
NRG Data_Plug Files
Txt Files

Note that not all data plug files were available from UND for this site. It is important to note that these are the raw files without any compensation for offset. It is also important to note that the temperature was not recorded during this period.

For this data, UND applied an offset of +9° to the wind vane data. This corrected data and wind resource summary report are available here:

CSU was chosen as the contractor for the program on September 14, 2007. From the UND data, an analysis of the wind resource was developed using Windographer 1.13. For this data, an offset of +9° was applied to the wind vane data. No data quality analysis was performed for this data other than what was available from the flag data fields included in the data. The suspect data was first removed from the collected data. Windographer was then used to add in synthetic data to these intervals with suspect data. The Windographer files (with blanks for the suspect data and with the blanks filled with synthetic data) are given below:

Complete Wind Resource Summary

The anemometer tower was removed from the site on July 9, 2004. Highlights of the wind resource at this site for the entire data collection period using the Windographer for the data adjusted for data quality and offset by +9° are shown below:

Data Properties
Variable
Data Set Starts:
4/21/2003 13:30
Height above ground (m)
20m
Data Set Ends:
7/9/2004 08:20
Mean wind speed (mph)
14.66
Data Set Duration:
15 months
Median wind speed (mph)
14.11
Length of Time Step:
10 minutes
Min wind speed (mph)
0.00
Elevation (ft.):
3,790
Max wind speed (mph)
57.68
Calm threshold (mph):
0
Mean power density (W/m²)
263
Wind Power Coefficients
Mean energy content (kWh/m²/yr)
2,302
Power Density at 50m:
372 W/m²
Energy pattern factor
1.703
Wind Power Class:
3 (Fair)
Weibull k
2.273
Wind Shear Coefficients
Weibull c (mph)
16.55
Power Law Exponent:
0.126
1-hr autocorrelation coefficient
0.829
Surface Roughness:
0.01 m
Diurnal pattern strength
0.066
Roughness Class:
0.780
Hour of peak wind speed
18
Roughness Description:
Rough Pasture
Mean turbulence intensity
0.145
Note: The wind power density and wind power class at 50m are projections of the data from 20m. A surface roughness of 0.01 meters was assumed for this projection. This is equal to that of a rough pasture. This value was then used this to calculate the roughness class and the power law exponent shown above.
Standard deviation (mph)
6.81
Coefficient of variation (%)
46.4
Frequency of calms (%)
0.26
Possible records
64,049
Valid records
63,322
Missing records
727
Data recovery rate (%)
98.9

 

Windographer was used to match up the wind at this site with the performance curves of some common turbines of various sizes and various heights, allowing for losses of about 13%. The table below shows the results. For the larger turbines, the tower height was increased to account for the larger turbine blades - the wind resource was extrapolated to these higher heights. Keep in mind that the larger and the higher the turbine, the better the wind and the greater the output. But of course, as the tower heights and turbine sizes increase so does the cost.

Turbine
Rotor
Diameter
meters
Rotor
Power
kW
Hub
Height
meters
Hub
Height
Wind
Speed
mph
Time
At
Zero
Output
percent
Time
At
Rated
Output
percent
Average
Net
Power
Output
kW
Average
Net
Energy
Output
kWh/yr
Average
Net
Capacity
Factor
%
Bergey Excel-R
6.7
7.5
20
14.66
12.27
5.37
2.08
18,200
27.7
Bergey Excel-S
6.7
10
20
14.66
4.93
2.71
2.22
19,400
22.2
Bergey XL.1
2.5
1
20
14.66
1.52
7.47
0.31
2,700
30.9
Southwest Skystream 3.7
3.7
1.8
20
14.66
10.93
0
0.57
5,000
31.7
Southwest Whisper 500
4.5
3
20
14.66
12.24
6.59
0.99
8,600
32.9
Northern Power NW 100/20
20
100
25
15.13
20.02
0
20.1
176,100
20.1
Vestas V47 - 660 kW
47
660
65
17.3
7.78
0.84
205
1,798,100
31.1
GE 1.5s
70.5
1,500
80.5
17.82
10.95
7.38
437
3,830,000
29.1
Vestas V80 - 2.0 MW
80
2,000
100
18.37
10.36
3.87
684
5,993,600
34.2
GE 2.5xl
100
2,500
110
18.62
6.98
9.20
955
8,369,200
38.2

 


For more information Contact Us!

 



Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Contact CSU
© 2008 Mechanical Engineering,
Colorado State University. All Rights Reserved.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA (970) 491-7709
Last updated: June 2009
Email questions & comments to: michael@engr.colostate.edu
This page is Javascript enabled. Turn on Javascript to view.